Pinpoint · Judgment search

Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2)

[2010] NSWSC 1062

Supreme Court of NSW · 17 September 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2010: 1 citing judgment 2012: 2 citing judgments 2013: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd & Ors (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 1107 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. In the matter of Wan Ze Property Development (Aust) Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 722 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 16× · judgment
  3. In the matter of Century Group Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 1084 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  4. Elie Chahwan v Bycoon (in liq.) Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 159 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. National Parks and Wildlife Service v Pierson [2002] NSWCA 273 Cited cited 29×
  2. Ayoub & Anor v Euphoric Pty Limited t/as Clay & Michel [2004] NSWCA 457 Cited cited 8×
  3. Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1002 Cited cited 20×
  4. Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd trading as Clay & Michel [2008] NSWCA 52 Cited cited 93×
  5. Hans Pet Constructions Pty Limited v Cassar [2009] NSWCA 230 Cited cited 154×
  6. Pacanowski v Simon Wakerman & Associates [2009] NSWCA 402 Cited cited 14×
  7. Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd trading as Clay & Michael & anor [2009] NSWSC 805 Cited cited 20×
  8. Bi v Mourad [2010] NSWCA 17 Cited cited 101×
  9. Chahwan v Euphoric Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] NSWSC 445 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.