Pinpoint · Judgment search

Zimmerman v Perkiss

[2022] NSWDC 448

District Court of NSW · 7 October 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Cited 9

2022: 6 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 2 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Scott v Bodley [2022] NSWDC 459 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Randell v McLachlain [2022] NSWDC 506 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Georges v Georges; Georges v Georges [2022] NSWDC 558 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment
  5. Zimmerman v Perkiss (No 3) [2022] NSWDC 635 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Scott v Bodley (No 2) [2022] NSWDC 651 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. GRC Project Pty Ltd trading as GRC Property Management v Lai [2023] NSWDC 63 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Sommerville v Schieb; Horan v Schieb [2024] NSWDC 6 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  9. Mannoun v Ristevski [2024] NSWDC 564 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (36)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Speight v Gosnay (1891) 60 LJ QB 231 Cited cited 5×
  2. Toomey v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 173 Cited cited 19×
  3. Toomey v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 291 Cited cited 21×
  4. (QB) Jones v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1991) 36 NSWLR 364 Cited
  5. ARTHUR HARRIS v 718932 [2003] NSWCA 38 Cited cited 8×
  6. WEN YUE HE v AUSTRALIAN CHINESE NEWSPAPERS PTY LIMITED. [2005] NSWSC 253 Cited cited 8×
  7. VBAO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 60 Applied or followed cited 15×
  8. Ingot Capital Investments & Ors v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets & Ors [No 6] [2007] NSWSC 124 Cited cited 44×
  9. In the Matter of ACN 005 408 462 Pty Ltd (formerly TEAC Australia Pty Ltd) (No 2) [2008] FCA 1184 Cited
  10. Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1884 Cited cited 24×
  11. Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2015] FCA 652 Cited cited 60×
  12. Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Hibbert [2015] NSWCA 13 Cited cited 17×
  13. Bode v Mundell [2016] EWHC 2533 Cited cited 2×
  14. [2017] EWHC 2873 Cited
  15. Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 Cited cited 5×
  16. Nanosecond Corp Pty Ltd v Glen Carron Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] SASC 188 Cited
  17. Turley v Unite the Union [2019] EWHC 3547 Cited cited 5×
  18. [2019] EWHC 650 Cited
  19. Slaven v Prime Media Group Limited [2019] NSWDC 502 Cited cited 2×
  20. Johnson v McArdle [2020] EWHC 644 Cited cited 3×
  21. Defteros v Google Inc [2020] VSC 219 Cited cited 3×
  22. Tsamis v Victoria (No 8) (costs) [2020] VSC 67 Cited
  23. Hodges v Naish [2021] EWHC 1805 Cited cited 2×
  24. George v Cannell [2021] EWHC 2988 Cited cited 4×
  25. V'landys v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3) [2021] FCA 500 Cited cited 12×
  26. Gatto v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2021] VSC 83 Cited cited 3×
  27. Defteros v Google LLC [2021] VSCA 167 Cited cited 9×
  28. Banks v Cadwalladr [2022] EWHC 1417 Cited cited 5×
  29. Ruta v Department of Work and Pensions [2022] EWHC 1535 Cited cited 4×
  30. Tewari v Khetarpal [2022] EWHC 266 Cited
  31. CA Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 14 Cited
  32. Herron v HarperCollins Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCAFC 119 Cited cited 6×
  33. Bazzi v Dutton [2022] FCAFC 84 Cited cited 22×
  34. Rader v Haines [2022] NSWCA 198 Cited cited 19×
  35. Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 249 Cited cited 23×
  36. Wilks v Qu (Ruling) [2022] VCC 620 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.