Pinpoint · Judgment search

Conde v Hunter

[2009] FCA 1016

Federal Court of Australia · 11 September 2009 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2012: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2009 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Singh v Owners Strata Plan No 11723 (No 3) [2012] FCA 1121 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 18× · judgment
  2. Batterham v Nauer, in the matter of Peter James Batterham [2019] FCA 1648 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Matson v Attorney-General (No 2) [2022] FCA 213 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (29)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Bozson v Altrincham Urban District Council [1903] 1 KB 547 Cited cited 6×
  2. Re Black; Ex parte Jeffery (1932) 4 ABC 157 Cited cited 6×
  3. Re McAlister; Ex parte McAlister v Edith Moore (1936) 8 ABC 283 Cited cited 2×
  4. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  5. Hall v Nominal Defendant [1966] HCA 36 Cited cited 210×
  6. Licul v Corney [1976] HCA 6 Cited cited 103×
  7. (1981) 78 Law Society Gazette Reports 631 Cited cited 2×
  8. Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) [1981] HCA 20 Cited cited 268×
  9. Kayo Contractors v Fernandez (1984) 71 FLR 34 Cited cited 5×
  10. Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59 Cited cited 1,384×
  11. Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 801 Cited cited 817×
  12. Re Gibbs; Ex parte Triscott (1995) 65 FCR 80 Cited cited 10×
  13. QBE Insurance Ltd v Switzerland Insurance Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd (1996) 134 ALR 433 Cited cited 5×
  14. Jenkins v National Australia Bank Ltd [1999] FCA 1758 Cited cited 2×
  15. Stec v Orfanos [1999] FCA 457 Cited cited 27×
  16. Conway v Jackson [2001] FCA 230 Cited cited 8×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia [2001] HCA 17 Cited cited 848×
  18. SBBS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 361 Cited cited 133×
  19. Franks v Warringah Council, in the matter of Franks [2003] FCA 1047 Cited cited 7×
  20. VFAB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 872 Cited cited 79×
  21. InterTAN Inc v DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited [2005] FCAFC 54 Cited cited 24×
  22. Patten v New Holland Credit Australia Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1724 Cited cited 2×
  23. Zambini v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2006] FCA 1773 Cited cited 10×
  24. Dunstan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [2007] FCA 1326 Cited cited 4×
  25. Genovese v BGC Construction Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 923 Cited cited 15×
  26. Druett v Department of Families, Community Services & Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCA 995 Applied or followed cited 2×
  27. Bishop v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2008] FCA 1118 Applied or followed cited 6×
  28. Rana v University of Adelaide (No 2) [2008] FCA 941 Cited
  29. Conde v Hunter [2009] FMCA 751 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.