Pinpoint · Judgment search

Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 8)

[2017] FCA 258

Federal Court of Australia · 17 March 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2017: 2 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation (No 3) [2017] FCA 465 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Accor Australia & New Zealand Hospitality Pty Ltd v Liv Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 110 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 2× · judgment
  3. Valra Pty Ltd v Mag Men Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 314 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  4. Sealed Air Australia Pty Limited v Aus-Lid Enterprises Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 388 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Registrar of Personal Property Securities v Brookfield (No 2) [2024] FCA 175 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Ivory v Howard [2024] FCA 1416 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Fowdh v Fowdh [1993] NSWCA 100 Cited cited 7×
  2. Shaw v Jarldorn [1999] SASC 529 Cited cited 10×
  3. Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1865 Applied or followed cited 461×
  4. Rolls Royce Industrial Power (Pacific) Limited (Formerly John Thompson (Australia) Pty Limited) v James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited; James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited v The State of New South Wales; James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (Pacific) Limited (Formerly John Thompson (Australia) Pty Limited) [2001] NSWCA 461 Cited cited 84×
  5. Futuretronics.com.au Pty Ltd v Graphix Labels Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 40 Cited cited 44×
  6. Julstar Pty Ltd v Hart Trading Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 657 Cited cited 3×
  7. Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 141 Cited cited 38×
  8. Specsavers Pty Ltd v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 652 Cited cited 17×
  9. Specsavers Pty Ltd v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 183 Cited cited 15×
  10. Loyola v Cryeng Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 98 Cited cited 9×
  11. Julstar Pty Ltd v Hart Trading Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 108 Cited cited 2×
  12. Avetmiss Easy Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Qualifications Authority (No 2) [2014] FCA 444 Cited cited 11×
  13. Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 991 Cited cited 2×
  14. Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 139 Applied or followed cited 2×
  15. Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 2) [2015] FCA 750 Cited cited 66×
  16. Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 762 Cited cited 5×
  17. Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru [No 2] [2015] HCA 53 Cited cited 127×
  18. Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] FCA 1534 Cited cited 4×
  19. Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 7) [2016] FCA 1587 Cited cited 2×
  20. Rakic v Johns Lyng Insurance Building Solutions (Victoria) Pty Ltd (Trustee) (No 2) [2016] FCA 783 Cited cited 6×
  21. Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 27 Cited cited 127×
  22. Westpac Banking Corporation v Wittenberg [2016] FCAFC 33 Cited cited 23×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.