Pinpoint · Judgment search

BIK17 v Minister for Home Affairs

[2020] FCA 1086

Federal Court of Australia · 29 July 2020 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. BDT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2023] FCA 452 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  2. WAJR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 106 Cited cited 58×
  3. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMOK [2009] FCAFC 83 Cited cited 35×
  4. MZAFZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1081 Cited cited 73×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v BBS16 [2017] FCAFC 176 Cited cited 142×
  6. [2017] FCAFC 1786 Cited
  7. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CRY16 [2017] FCAFC 210 Cited cited 119×
  8. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DZU16 [2018] FCAFC 32 Cited cited 54×
  9. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CLV16 [2018] FCAFC 80 Cited cited 39×
  10. BIK17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 2713 Cited
  11. Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16 Cited cited 326×
  12. Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34 Cited cited 627×
  13. DKF17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1963 Cited cited 2×
  14. Kassem v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 244 Cited cited 2×
  15. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 Cited cited 693×
  16. BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 34 Cited cited 152×
  17. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CED16 [2020] HCA 24 Cited cited 17×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.