Pinpoint · Judgment search

Ahmed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[1999] FCA 811

Federal Court of Australia · 21 June 1999 · Official judgment

Cited by 22 indexed judgments

All Overruled or disapproved 1 Not followed 1 Applied or followed 3 Cited 17

1999: 9 citing judgments, 2 negative 2000: 8 citing judgments 2001: 4 citing judgments 2013: 1 citing judgment 1999 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1234 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  2. Yue v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1404 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  3. Xu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1741 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 53× · judgment
  4. Sivaram v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1740 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 25× · judgment
  5. Hanna v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1772 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Yelda v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1841 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Re The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham [2000] HCA 1 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 616× · judgment
  8. Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 79 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Kandasamy [2000] FCA 67 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 14× · judgment
  10. Khelifi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 791 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 231× · judgment
  12. Anderson v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1730 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  13. Makdessi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 134 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 1,750× · judgment
  15. Applicant RV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1034 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1196 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 126× · judgment
  17. SZNYF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 148 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  2. Eshetu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 71 FCR 300 Cited cited 110×
  3. Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1997] FCA 324 Cited cited 14×
  4. Fleming v The Queen [1998] HCA 68 Cited cited 328×
  5. Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 160 ALR 24 Cited cited 5×
  6. Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×
  7. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu [1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.