Pinpoint · Judgment search

Karpik v Carnival plc

[2023] HCA 39 ; (2023) 98 ALJR 45

High Court of Australia · 6 December 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 12 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 11

2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 10 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Siemens WLL v BIC Contracting LLC (garnishee order) [2023] FCA 1664 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Gispac Pty Ltd v Michael Hill Jeweller (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 18 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  3. Bolin Technology Co., Ltd v BirdDog Technology Ltd [2024] FCA 129 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Kelly v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 130 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Auto & General Insurance Company Limited [2024] FCA 272 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd v HNOE Limited [2024] NSWSC 627 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v PayPal Australia Pty Limited [2024] FCA 762 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Michael Hill Jeweller (Australia) Pty Ltd v Gispac Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 211 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v H C F Life Insurance Company Pty Limited [2024] FCA 1240 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  10. HNOE Limited v Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 271 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  11. Harman v Opus Recruitment Solutions - Australia Pty Ltd (Stay Application) [2024] FCA 1356 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. Kain v R&B Investments Pty Ltd Ernst & Young (a firm) v R&B Investments Pty Ltd Shand v R&B Investments Pty Ltd [2025] HCA 28 Cited High Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (32)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Potter v Minahan [1908] HCA 63 Cited cited 229×
  2. Wanganui-Rangitikei Electric Power Board v Australian Mutual Provident Society [1934] HCA 3 Cited cited 37×
  3. Kay's Leasing Corporation Pty Ltd v Fletcher [1964] HCA 79 Cited cited 21×
  4. Brooks v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd [1969] HCA 4 Cited cited 46×
  5. Freehold Land Investments Ltd v Queensland Estates Pty Ltd [1970] HCA 31 Cited cited 13×
  6. Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×
  7. Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co Ltd [1996] HCA 39 Cited cited 74×
  8. Henry v Henry [1996] HCA 51 Cited cited 97×
  9. Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [1998] HCA 69 Cited cited 336×
  10. Regie Nationale des Usines Renault SA v Zhang [2002] HCA 10 Cited cited 142×
  11. I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 41 Cited cited 224×
  12. The Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49 Cited cited 324×
  13. Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd [2005] HCA 54 Cited cited 89×
  14. Old UGC, Inc v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales in Court Session [2006] HCA 24 Cited cited 41×
  15. Sweedman v Transport Accident Commission [2006] HCA 8 Cited cited 20×
  16. Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank plc [2008] AC 316 Cited
  17. International Finance Trust Company Limited v New South Wales Crime Commission [2009] HCA 49 Cited cited 135×
  18. Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23 Cited cited 283×
  19. AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion (2011) 563 US 333 Cited
  20. Insight Vacations Pty Ltd v Young [2011] HCA 16 Cited cited 27×
  21. Westport Insurance Corporation v Gordian Runoff Limited [2011] HCA 37 Cited cited 37×
  22. Chubb Insurance Company of Australia Limited v Moore [2013] NSWCA 212 Cited cited 38×
  23. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 3) [2016] FCA 196 Cited cited 58×
  24. R v Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commissioner [2016] HCA 8 Cited cited 31×
  25. (2017) 718 Fed Appx 502 Cited
  26. Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCAFC 224 Cited cited 28×
  27. Huntingdale Village Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) v Corrs Chambers Westgarth [2018] WASCA 90 Cited cited 7×
  28. BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45 Cited cited 103×
  29. DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 242 Cited cited 22×
  30. Price v Spoor [2021] HCA 20 Cited cited 27×
  31. R (KBR Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2022] AC 519 Cited
  32. BHP Group Limited v Impiombato [2022] HCA 33 Cited cited 17×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.